- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 03:55, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Jami ul Kamil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't see much available sources on the notability of this work, albeit its author has been very well appreciated for it. The creator of this article has copied several references and content from Ziya-ur-Rahman Azmi (and no attribution in the article history). This is possibly TOOSOON for this book and I suggest an ATD i.e. redirect to its author's article. ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It does not make sense that the author which is famous for certain book should be there in Wikipedia but the book itself should be deleted.
As the article is under construction. So the points above mentioned will be fixed in coming few days.
Hasan.2526272829 (talk) 2:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:32, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I searched in Arabic for the full title "الجامع الكامل في الحديث الصحيح الشامل" and turned up a lot of user-generated content (especially download links...) but no RS. The wiki article itself implies one RS through a citation to "Bhatti 2012, p. 75" but the actual book by Bhatti being cited is not listed anywhere so I can't check it. The other independent source is a bio of Azmi (this book's editor/author), by a different Azmi, which has five sentences on this book. That source does call this book "the most important" of Azmi's many books but overall is a little marginal as a source, I think. It seems possible that this book as received the two reviews necessary for WP:NBOOK but I don't think the "slam dunk" sourcing has yet been demonstrated. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 20:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.