The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus -- Ynot? 14:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm trying to find what these books she's supposed to have written are: I think it's
World public order of the environment: towards an international ecological law and organization (University of Toronto Press, 1979)[1]
Summary Report to the United Nations Environment Programme: Signing Session of the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea, 6-10 December 1982[2]
But there's no evidence it's the same Jan Schneider. She might manage to pass WP:GNG but I'm not 100% sure. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:14, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
She really hasn't done anything that is notable. I mean not everyone can have a wikipedia page. Let's use some common sense here: just because a few articles mentioned her doesn't mean she's a notable person. She lost the election. She hasn't done anything extremely newsworthy in her lifetime.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 16:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Significant coverage in reliable sources seems to exist; there are are a couple of references currently in the article and more accessible on Google News. See also WP:JNN. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 23:08, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Florida's 13th congressional district#Election Results, subject has received coverage from non-primary reliable sources in connection to the two elections which the subject was a candidate for. The subject has not received significant coverage outside of these two events, and fails WP:POLITICIANS. Per WP:POLOUTCOMES the normal course of action is to redirect the article to the event where the subject received the significant coverage for; as no article exist for either race which the subject was a candidate for, a redirect to the election results will suffice.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 06:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar·· 07:03, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 18:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.