The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. One of the "keep" voters proved that the artist has received enough coverage to meet WP:NACTOR. (non-admin closure) ASTIG😎 (ICE TICE CUBE) 02:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremiah Lisbo[edit]

Jeremiah Lisbo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a young actor who does not seem to have landed any notable roles. All references have been merely mentions of the subject nothing which discusses the subject in any sort of depth signifigant coverage or they are produced by a connected subject. Fails WP:NACTOR. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 00:56, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I did look through these and I will tell you why I rejected them as helping to establish notability. 1,2, and 4 are a promotional interview and generally not counted towards notability as these are paid engagements by the agencies. 3 is a press release by his agency which does not to help establish notability. 5 is the mere mention of his name but then goes on to explain his characters basic premise in the show it does not discuss the actor. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 01:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to see some evidence that profiles by independent news outlets are paid engagements. 3 is not a press release. The 5th reference does discuss the actor, in fact it contains quotes from him. Koikefan (talk) 01:57, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Koikefan: The 5th reference only contains quotes from the actor, which does not help demonstrate notability. Your goal should be to find independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the actor. GoingBatty (talk) 02:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your input. I have provided 5 sources, which I believe (even if you ignore 1-2 of them) suffices for the requirements. I have already quoted WP: Multiple sources, which states that typically 3 references will suffice to rebuff challenges to a figure's notability. Furthermore, I would like to reiterate that claims that certain news articles or writings are "paid engagements" should be buttressed by actual evidence rather than baseless assertions. I think I have also sufficiently explained why the actor's roles are significant and notable above. I'll leave it to other voters to determine whether they want to deviate from the common standard and see more than 3 references for proof of the actor's notability. Koikefan (talk) 08:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.