The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Harro5 00:55, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John Wright (massuer)[edit]

Excuse my ignorance of English football clubs, but is the team massuer really deserving of a wikipedia article? Pboyd04 01:42, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Important for the team, no doubt, but not notable for WP. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 01:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails Professor Test. — MATHWIZ2020 ^{TALK | CONTRIBS} 01:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Stephen Wright. Jobe6 02:10, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge and redirect per above. -- JJay 02:18, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as per above. But do we need it as a redirect? Is anyone going to search for this guy by this misspelled title? Grutness...wha? 04:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable biography, even speedyable. Doesn't need a mention at Stephen Wright disambig page. --Quarl 05:23, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete next up will be the waterboy?--MONGO 09:43, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete mis-spelled title, unimportant subject. Nothing worth keeping, as far as I can see. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 11:34, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's bad enough third-stringers get their own articles. Massuer (?) - I think not. Denni ☯ 01:13, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.