The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 21:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Clement[edit]

Jordan Clement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I originally PRODded this, but removed it when I realised the creator had been blocked for 1 week, and it was patently unfair. He is now unblocked and willing to do some good, which is always nice to see, but I still believe this player fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 21:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NFOOTY failure. Number 57 21:41, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly fails WP:NFOOTY. Govvy (talk) 21:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NFOOTY in my opinion. JMHamo (talk) 23:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what, why don't you delete it! It took me an hour to make but I understand I can't say much to contest it. That is why as you may have seen I am trying to get admins on my side to get change these guidelines to allow less known footballers and less notable teams to STAY on Wikipedia and NOT get deleted. Hopefully, in the near future, Jordan Clement will be back on Wikipedia in no time at all.Boomage (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Is Conference South fully professional? Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, in fact I'm not sure there is even a single full-time professional team in that division -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:38, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:GNG and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- a minor league player who failed even to pay for his own club! Not clear if he was sacked or resigned. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Almost certainly neither, he simply didn't have his contract renewed when it came up for renewal because he didn't feature in the current manager's plans...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.