The result was keep. Although there is one delete vote, the keep votes have provided, IMHO, sufficient evidence to refute the delete voter's reasoning. Taking that refutation and the quality of the arguements of the people supporting the article's inclusion in Wikipedia, I see the consensus as being a strong keep, with any other outcome having "a snowballs chance in hell" (per WP:SNOW). (non-admin closure) Foxy Loxy Pounce! 02:50, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
An article on a magazine which is written as a directory entry and lacks independent sources (the sources are the journal and its sponsor organisation). Guy (Help!) 22:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]