The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:40, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kamuning Road[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Likely fails WP:GEOROAD, with very little sourcing to reliable, independent secondary sources that do not mention it in passing. The only source used is [1] (current page is at [2]), which is still not sufficient. Unsure if its national tertiary highway status can help it evade WP:GEOROAD rules. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:28, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Other than being the road that connects Tomas Morato Avenue and EDSA, I can't think (yet) of any compelling reason for this street requiring to have its own Wikipedia article (e.g. any historical or major newsworthy event) --- Tito Pao (talk) 09:12, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:12, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GEOROAD per nom. Not a major road, a road that has little to no well-known establishments unlike Tomas Morato Avenue. SBKSPP (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.