The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No sourcing to evidence notability under WP:GNG was provided. joe decker^{talk to me} 19:07, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kaploosh[edit]

Kaploosh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Non-notable game that clearly fails wp:notmadeup. Dac04 (talk) 18:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Fails General notability guideline. Not a notable sport at least, with no reliable sources to support. --SMS ^Talk 19:48, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. SL93 (talk) 23:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I'm not sure how this would fail a PROD, considering WP:MADEUP and WP:GNG Ducknish (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.