The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Davewild (talk) 18:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kaymu[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no evidence for notability. All new technology companies are listed in telechruch and similar sources, which are therefore essentially nonselective directories as far as reliability for notability is concerned DGG ( talk ) 17:25, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:13, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:- Subject of the article is a Nigeria's leading online marketplace per Vanguard News, The Punch Newspaper, Daily Independent Newspaper and New Telegraph. I also found The Nation News, The punch News, this Nigeria Communication Week, Punch News to mention but few. In fact "Kaymu" had been the subject of 1000+ reliable sources. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 22:20, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:- Subject definitely notable enough. Outside tech blogs, found respected news sources discussing Kaymu in other topics: Daily Times, Daily Independent, The Punch Newspaper, The Guardian, as well as other African and Asian newspapers - online and offline: CP Africa, The Daily Star, DailyPost, All Africa, This Day Live. Captainzarmani (talk) 13:00, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The reliable sources found above are definitely sufficient to establish notability. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:02, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.