- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 20:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Kent Kern[edit]
- Kent Kern (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to fail WP:GNG; none of the sources used for this article are both independent and in-depth coverage. I am also concerned about the veracity of the article, which was created by a user now indefinitely blocked for adding hoax information to multiple articles (and is continuing to be edited by them through IP socks). Cheers, Number 57 15:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- delete I dont see a single claim for notability here in the article, clearly does not pass WP:NPROF. --hroest 20:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. He seems to be a perfectly respectable high level school district administrator, but the content tends to being a tracking of mentions in news reports, nothing really is substantive all about himself. If notable for being superintendent of San Juan Unified School District, I would expect San Juan Unified School District to have more coverage in him, and on all past superintendents. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Honestly he has more coverage than a lot of other articles on the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.235.28.72 (talk) 16:49, 1 November 2021 (UTC) [reply]
- Struck as this is a sock of the article creator. Number 57 18:16, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.