The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Knowlarity[edit]

Knowlarity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement Sario528 (talk) 10:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Singapore, and Haryana. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Article has links to reliable publications with non-trivial coverage. However, it does read like an advertisement and the puffery needs to be taken down several notches. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 21:54, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Besides probably being written by the marketing company Candid marketing, I don't see any coverage that could possibly support the writing of an encyclopedic article. The Khaleej Times article fails ORGIND, Techstory is a blatant ad, and it's unclear they have an editorial process, the Indian Express article, besides falling under INHERITORG, does not cover the software in depth. Not sure if it's based on the same IANS news release that was in this Economic Times article, which seems to be a permanent deadlink but I believe should have the same content as the (google cached) Deccan Herald article here, but neither is compliant to current standards. Alpha3031 (t • c) 08:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 11:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not the most helpful of nominations, I must note. However, clearly WP:SERIESA stuff here, fails WP:GNG; WP:NCORP with a LOT of company statement derived material in sources. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:32, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.