The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:35, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kollaborators[edit]

Speedy tagged than contested. I don't see a clear case for this meeting WP:CORP and the references are rather trivial, but I thought I'd give it a discussion. My opinion is Delete. Isotope23 20:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability in terms of 3rd-party reliable sources has not been shown. No objection to re-creating the article later if proper sources are added. If this group has achieved notice there ought to be press coverage. EdJohnston 03:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Johnston. — Athænara ✉ 05:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- a quick Google search on Kollaborators+area+10 turned up just 30 hits, none of them appearing to meet the Reliable Source and Notability Guidelines' requirements. I'm willing to overlook conflict of interest issues and reconsider if notability is demonstrated. --A. B. ^(talk) 03:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.