The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no administrator tools necessary. Any editor can revert, and all editors have the tools to do so. As a demonstration of that, I have just hit the "edit this page" button and reverted, without touching any of my administrator tools. Uncle G (talk) 14:06, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LCC[edit]

LCC (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable and unreferenced team in unknown league. Articles being created on players are receiving Speedy deletes. Paste (talk) 20:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Upon looking into the articles history it seems that originally it was a perfectly good article that has been completely changed by User:Liverpoolcc. Paste (talk) 22:33, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I'd be bold and revert to quite useful disambig page version but I'm not sure that's valid in the spirit of the AfD since it entirely reverts the article from the AfD'ed state. MadScot (talk) 00:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• restore dab and do an administrator rollback to hide all edits past the last one to the dab page version of this page. 76.66.195.63 (talk) 06:54, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment why can't this be reverted as vandalism ? User:Liverpoolcc surely must have known what her/his action on wiping an existing page meant. 76.66.195.63 (talk) 06:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.