The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: This page gives some information on her. 96T 21:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. I fixed the gender in the article and added a link to her website. Her resumé does list some installations that could be used to establish notability. A few more links: [1][2][3][4][5]. But I'm not yet seeing enough to convince me she meets our notability standards. —David Eppstein 22:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, when I searched for her on google before AFDing this, most links I found were simply hawking her products. New EnglandReview Me!/Go Red Sox! 22:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete, nothing found in a search of Google Books, Scholar, or News Archive. High number of WP:GHITS kinda maybe suggest possibility of being sourceable with some digging, but no clear notability. --Dhartung | Talk 22:16, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Some exhibition refs on the website seem to suggest major shows, but I'm dubious. All very vague & no independent sources seem to exist. Johnbod 22:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Johnbod. Also, many of the shows on the resume are art fairs, which have substantial fringes where the notable and non-notable rub shoulders.--Ethicoaestheticist 23:22, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. - Modernist 21:12, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.