The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Well referenced article and no consensus to delete. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 04:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of Australian television ratings for 2008[edit]

Requests for sources have been asked in the past with the editor/s removing the tag. I feel that no sources can be placed therefore content could be incorrect and fails to state why it's notable. Bidgee (talk) 13:18, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - The situation has been rectified - Had a request been made direct to those who regularly maintanance the page - the references would have been up sooner.

We apologise for the distress the absence of referencing has caused - and we sincerely hope the problem is now rectified to the satisfaction of those who may have suffered as a consequence of a lack of referencing.--Bortholomew (talk) 13:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: Sources are given at the base. The page has been tagged with "unreferenced" since 31 May, 2008 -- when there were no references. You retagged it on 27 June, and there are now sources. seicer | talk | contribs 13:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not really[1]. I wouldn't class those as sources but as notes which didn't prove it's notability or facts. Bidgee (talk) 14:16, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, this is in the spirit of 'assume good faith' i trust. Simple exploration of the sources finds all the info noted and thus easily verifiable... Not that this was ever in question by those who author in the Australian TV Project. --Bortholomew (talk) 14:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sourced and notable. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 14:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep - Page references are solid; explore and you will find the info published. Simple. --Bortholomew (talk) 14:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Improve via WP:POTENTIAL with goodreliable sources —Preceding unsigned comment added by Numyht (talk • contribs) 18:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.