The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:55, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Cartoon Network programing blocks[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating myself for deletion, has only five sources and not notable enough. JJ98 (Talk) 18:54, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep - Article provides sufficient coverage of its subject material, of which some have branched off into their own articles. More sources are available as well, and all I really see that is needed here is a Refimprove tag. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 20:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per my arguments on my nom Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicktoons Summer Beach House (2nd nomination) which dealt with this issue involving Nickelodeon programming blocks; this is of interest to only a select few, nobody beyond those obsessed with CN details really care one way or another, it makes obvious statements (you mean the "Wednesdays" block only airs on Wednesdays? My whole world has shifted on it's axis!), and speculates about a rights deal which won't be in effect for a year yet. Also, TV movies are not programming blocks. Nate • (chatter) 20:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also note I am requesting for G7 myself for you Mrschimpf (aka Nate). Also note I removed all the Cartoon Network programing blocks in the main article since it is completely unsorced. JJ98 (Talk) 21:21, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 22:33, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Programing"? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 13:49, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per WP:NOTTVGUIDE. (I was pleasantly surprised to see that "NOTTVGUIDE" really does exist.) I don't think that more references will help this, the list is more of a program directory than anything encyclopedic. -- Atama頭 16:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.