The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:40, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of National Hockey League controversies[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ill defined article. What is and what isn't a controversy? WP:OR is also an issue. A similar baseball like list was deleted[1] some months back....William 14:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. ...William 14:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Delete per the majority of my rationale in the AfD for the baseball list: "This article is a hopeless and indiscriminate mishmash of unrelated events grouped by someone's POV idea of what constitutes a "controversy", therefore falling into the realm of original research by synthesis." Reso lute 14:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per Resolute. Or to quote the fan from the video clip of halftime at the Jets-Patriots Thanksgiving game: "Garbage ... garbage ... garbage ... garbage ..." Ravenswing 00:53, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 01:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.