The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge. seresin ( ¡? ) 00:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of chaebol by total revenues[edit]

I don't see any merit of the list with just 10 entries and no reference. The list look suitable to be included in Chaebol. So I suggest it to be merged into the article. Caspian blue (talk) 19:17, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Then go for it. You don't need to bring merge requests here and 'List of chaebol by total revenues' appears to be a possible search term so this should be turned into a redirect rather than be deleted after the content is moved. Nick Dowling (talk) 00:45, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but I think this nomination is a courtesy to the creator before merging the content by myself.--Caspian blue (talk) 00:52, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without redirect or merger- We don't need a separate page for comparing revenues. What's this, a lesson for Microeconomics course? Arbiteroftruth (talk) 06:40, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 20:59, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and expand and reference. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 07:20, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge very short list, might as well be added to the other page. --Gman124^talk 04:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - per User:Caspian blue --T-rex 16:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.