The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Salvio ^giuliano 21:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of felidaes by population[edit]

List of felidaes by population (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

All the information in this list is duplicated at List of felids, where it is also complete and up-to-date. This list is essentially a content-fork now. SilverTiger12 (talk) 16:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. SilverTiger12 (talk) 16:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I question the utility of all these "X by population" lists. In this case it's particularly superfluous, as noted, except for the specific application of sorting the entire list by pop size, which doesn't work with the sectioned list. But an extra article for that functionality? No. Plus, how did that hackneyed plural stick around so long... --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.