The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singu larity 08:03, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of fictional aircraft in Ace Combat[edit]

It seems as though a similar article once existed and was brought up to afd. The same reasons for its deletion applies to this one as well.

See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 30#Aircraft of Ace Combat « ₣M₣ » 13:36, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A whole, whole, whole, whole lot of fancruft. A shame someone wasted their Friday night on this :) —97198 talk 13:44, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- So basically, you're saying it shouldn't be here because you're not interested in it? That's patently ridiculous. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 15:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, fancruft generally means that it's a collection of indiscriminate information to anyone who's not a hardcore fan. —97198 talk 01:33, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - In other words, it means that you're not interested in it. Others might be. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 18:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:ITSCRUFT 216.37.86.10 (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest merge, but frankly it's way too long. Therefore, an unequivocal Keep. It's information; therefore, it's relevant to a project aiming to compile the sum of all human knowledge. Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 15:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The telephone directory also constitutes information, but Wikipedia is not using that. Advertisements also constitutes information, but Wikipedia is not using that. Hoaxes also constitutes information, but Wikipedia is not using that. My grocery receipts also constitutes information, but Wikipedia is not using that. --Calton | Talk 17:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete game cruft. Of no relevance or impact outside the universe of the game, nothing even close to anything like evidence of extensive coverage in reliable secondary sources. Arbitrary collection of trivia. Fails WP:N, WP:RS, etc etc etc. I suspect this may qualify for speedy deletion per CSD:G4, can someone investigate similarity to Aircraft of Ace Combat? Pete.Hurd (talk) 20:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not game guide. Zero Kitsune (talk) 21:29, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and per WP not being a game guide. --Calton | Talk 17:36, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another 00:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - huge amount of info, someone's obviously done a lot of work here. Unfortunately, that's no argument for keeping an article, and this indiscriminate collection of information belongs somewhere else, perhaps a gaming wiki?Yeti Hunter (talk) 11:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to a suitable gaming wiki and Delete. This is very much game guide material.Gazimoff (talk) 10:09, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Transwiki if not covered by a relevant gaming wiki. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 19:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not a game guide. There's plenty of useful information here, but it just doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Terraxos (talk) 03:48, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.