The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:16, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of ice storms[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced list, no clear criteria for inclusion, most of the storms don't have articles. Prod declined. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep, clean up It's not completely unsourced: all the storms that have their own articles have some sources in the linked articles. Lists don't have to have the references in the actual list article in this case. However, it might be worthwhile removing the ones that aren't notable enough to have their own article. --Slashme (talk) 08:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, valid list indexing articles that satisfies WP:LISTPURP and WP:CLN, and arguably WP:LISTN as sources do discuss ice storms as a group and compare them. The inclusion criteria would be, at a minimum, the same as Category:Ice storms (i.e., "is this an article about an ice storm?"), though editors may also validly decide that there are more ice storm articles that should exist, and non-notable entries could even be included by consensus so long as they are verifiable. Ultimately the nomination raises only cleanup issues and no valid ones for deletion. postdlf (talk) 17:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:NOTDUP relative to Category:Ice storms and WP:LISTPURP per the blue-links to storm articles. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and cleanup, per the above comments. --cyclopia ^speak! 14:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per NOTDUP & LISTPURP. -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 00:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think this article gives a good list of the Ice Storms. But I think we need references for all the storms. If proper references are added then it can be a good WP:LIST. I don't find any reason to delete this article. Unatnas1986 (talk) 11:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.