The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of known JNA fatalities in the 1992 JNA column incident in Tuzla[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a blatant POV-fork from 1992 Yugoslav People's Army column incident in Tuzla, where an RfC is underway, in which a consensus appears to be forming that this list of names should not be included in the article. Also WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:11, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it should be kept as it shows that there were without doubt +50 deaths suffered by the JNA, amongst numerous other reasons.Citadel48 (talk) 23:15, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- With respect, all that is needed for that is a reliably sourced sentence in the parent article. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree, but there are almost no (if any) reliable & definitive sources that can be trusted. The death on one website will exceed 300, on another it well be less than 50.Citadel48 (talk) 23:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - In which case, how can you know this list of names is even right? Just another reason not to have a list of them on WP. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:31, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Then it should at least be kept for reference, and then, falsifying deaths, etc, is illegal in numerous countries.Citadel48 (talk) 23:44, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        I think you are missing the point. WP isn't for that. Either it can be reliably sourced and is encyclopedic, or it isn't. In my view, this isn't either. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:45, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        Well there is a rather large list of names, compiled with the incident & laws, I believe it should be kept, as even numerous others have stated it is too large too be included elsewhere.Citadel48 (talk) 23:48, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, due WP:NOTMEMORIAL. Buckshot06 (talk) 22:21, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Yugoslavia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nomination. Anotherclown (talk) 02:33, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTMEMORIAL, per nom and per the result of the many similar AfDs over the years. Nick-D (talk) 07:16, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.