The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 21:40, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of management of The Walt Disney Company[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Superfluous over detailed list that shouldn’t be separate from the main company article. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 16:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 16:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. rsjaffe 🗩 🖉 16:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:17, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with the nom, this is overkill and undersourced. Swing the axe. TomStar81 (Talk) 17:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The referencing is abysmal with only four sources cited, the newest of which was published 57 years ago. The vast majority of the content fails Verifiability. The list selection criteria are unstated and seemingly arbitrary. A very large percentage of the people listed are not notable and are simply corporate functionaries. As far as I know, we have no comparable article for any other corporation. Cullen328 (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete User:Cytkory has been around WP for nine years, and I'm absolutely baffled why he thinks this is an appropriate encyclopedia article. Nowhere else on this entire project do we list hundreds of non-notable people in corporate management like this. Reywas92^Talk 21:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the bulk of this page utterly fails WP:V, I'm pretty sure that the vast majority of people listed here do not meet GNG or SNG, other articles (The Walt Disney Company and its subsidiaries) already cover the most important information (i.e. key executives), and significantly larger companies (Apple Inc., Microsoft, Meta Platforms) do not have standalone articles for their management, so I don't see why Disney should. The remaining relevant and sourced information can be incorporated into the The Walt Disney Company article. Colonestarrice (talk) 01:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Incredible WP:NOTDIR violation with a paucity of sources and a whole host of people who don't meet GNG, and an article form we have for no other company; also considering certain properties and their fanbases, I'm very uncomfortable with some wayward fan using this unsourced list to figure out an email/social presence and attack someone without cause to try to 'right a great wrong'. Nate • (chatter) 02:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nominator is absolutely correct. This is groteque visualition of what we do not want in lists. gidonb (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I tried to just edit the list down to notable people or job titles (AKA- bluelinks) and it was pathetic. a totally unnecessary page that should not exist. Nightenbelle (talk) 18:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it looks like all of the notable Disney execs already have pages. Also, it seems like this would change as people get promoted or fired without enough coverage of these events to even make sure its up to date. BuySomeApples (talk) 20:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Or even with coverage somewhere. It is too much for even a near decent job of keeping up with. gidonb (talk) 12:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 22:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per V arguments and by extension BLP. Where's the SNOW deletion option? Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:10, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There's no evidence this is a topic in its own right and poor sourcing. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:55, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.