The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 14:06, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Little Portugal, San Jose[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

seems to not make notability for a named area. i added one link to show no bias Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:10, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 11:56, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: What about the other twenty-odd neighborhoods of San Jose of Template:Neighborhoods of San Jose? הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 19:29, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A city the size of San Jose (tenth-largest city in the U.S.) certainly deserves to have articles about its notable neighborhoods. However, Little Portugal does not appear to be one. There is no mention of this neighborhood on the city's website [1] and I could not find any Reliable Sources about it, although it clearly exists based on lesser sources [2] [3]. --MelanieN (talk) 22:48, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, that was not the city's official website. That was sanjose.org, not sanjose.gov. The official website is here and does not appear to have a section on neighborhoods. --MelanieN (talk) 22:54, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.