- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Live2support[edit]
- Live2support (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This company does not meet notability standards, and appears to lack sufficient coverage from significant sources. Upjav (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unreferenced software article of unclear notability, created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 23:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The article doesn't really make a case for notability and I didn't find coverage that convinced me that an article is merited here. --Michig (talk) 07:07, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.