The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Does not meet WP:BASIC joe deckertalk to me 16:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

London Vale[edit]

London Vale (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My PROD has been challenged by the subject. My rationale for the PROD was "Fails WP:BASIC - can't find any significant coverage regarding her as a model. Only RS on page [1] does not address the subject directly. (Source only discusses "London Sponsel" too...)" I don't think anything has changed since. SmartSE (talk) 09:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.