The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manshoon[edit]

Manshoon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The page has significant problems including no third-party sources, no real world information and an in-universe perspective. It has been sitting idle for months with no improvement and I have not been able to find any reliable sources covering the topic on which a renewed article could be based. With this in mind, unless new sources can be found I do not think the article can establish the real world perspective as outlined in Wikipedia's guideline on writing about fiction or be dealt with "in an encyclop[a]edic manner; discussing the reception, impact and significance". Guest9999 (talk) 20:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per Guest999. Could even have been a speedy "little or no context" as far as I'm concerned.    SIS  21:39, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- D&D geeks like me know who he is ... I doubt anyone else would. Most definitely not notable and it would be hard to find any kind of good third-party sourcing. Maybe for Fzoul, or Drizzt, who are more mainstream and in bigger media. But not frikken Manshoon. -- Logical Premise ^Ergo? 00:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:57, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.