The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:24, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark McWane[edit]

a man who writes his own tunes for video games he likes - em.. yes that's it. Lots of grand claims, nothing at all that suggests anything approaching notability. Fredrick day 09:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn, also almost certainly a vanity article --Lucid 11:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speed Delete: An obvious vanity article (created by MarkMcWane no less) on a non-notable subject. The KZA 11:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did try and speedy it - but it was removed and I was told to take it to afd if I wanted to follow it up *shrug*. --Fredrick day 11:25, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not appear to have enough notability, auto-biography. Zouavman Le Zouave 12:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Vanispam. THF 12:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - LOL. Jauerback 13:43, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nonnotable, self-promotion, I would have speedied. NawlinWiki 14:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Easy decision. SilkTork 15:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I should have reviewed the autobiography portion more closely, and I am agreement. My friend, Mark Knight, is a professional game music composer who has a similar entry, and it seemed reasonable for me. There is a difference between a pro like him having an article, I guess, versus an amateur like me. However, my music has been downloaded literally by tens of thousands of people from over 65 countries and used in the new ports to the games. It has also been referenced by numerous gamer sites and the like. However, if it needs to be deleted, that is fine with me. MarkMcWane 18:004, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.