The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 00:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Ingalls[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiographical article with little evidence of meeting WP:MUSIC. There is lots of namedropping. There are a few awards from organizations that are mostly non-notable. There is nothing resembling a reliable secondary source. Article was previously deprodded so I'm bringing it here. B (talk) 21:01, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Has released on some notable indie labels (Sargasso Records, Innova Recordings). Mentioned in San Francisco Classical Voice and quoted in the New York Times. -- Theodolite ➹ 21:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep There's a WP:COI here (and I've reinstated the notice previously removed from the article) but as Theodoloite says the subject does seem to have just about enough notability despite operating in a field with little media attention. AllyD (talk) 23:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep, per Theodolite and AllyD. A borderline case but I think there's enough hint of notability. The article could do with a major rewrite, though, and preferably not by the man himself. --Deskford (talk) 20:44, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.