The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:22, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maya Fukuzawa[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This has smelled bad since I first saw it but I only recently got back to it. Earlier versions had her being the daughter of a film director and very famous actress [1], as well as marrying a famous actor--all of which were based on unreliable sources (the marriage to Sakaguchi is called a hoax on the Japanese Wikipedia ja:坂口拓). I cut those BLP violations, but it still has her listed as executive producer for major Hollywood films (even though previous versions only have her being born in 1988). IMDb lists those credits too, but IMDb is not a reliable source. I checked the credits of the actual films for both Escape Plan and Ghost Rider and cannot find her name. Other sources are also not reliable. Eliminate those credits, and all we have is a minor actress with little in terms of RS who may have someone somewhere claiming things of her that may not be real. Her Japanese Wikipedia article was deleted for lack of notability [2]. Michitaro (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Michitaro (talk) 14:08, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on corresponding deletion in JP Wikipedia. Bensci54 (talk) 16:20, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom - Non notbale Japanese actress and film producer. –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, somewhat of a weak delete, although I found several sources here, possibly here, here, a French source, plus the article in the Tokyo Times, generally, somewhat agree with nom, does not add up to GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for mentioning these, some of which I had seen. I had trouble connecting to the Crunchyroll piece, but the rest only mention her name and do not constitute significant sources per WP:GNG. The Tokyo Times article is likely a hoax, as mentioned in the nomination. Michitaro (talk) 11:21, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.