The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:35, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meridian Gaming Ltd

Meridian Gaming Ltd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, speedied before as advertising Kleuske (talk) 17:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Agreed, delete, and salt in view of history of recreating. I was unable to find an independent source about Meridian Gaming that I would consider reliable and could form the basis of a Wikipedia article. We can verify that this corporation exists and offers online gambling services, but that's it, and that's no basis for an article. I considered whether it was possible to redirect it but we don't have a list of online casinos and I don't feel motivated to create one.—S Marshall T/C 18:06, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• I do not agree, since I see all over Wikipedia similar legit pages and articles about companies. There is no difference between those and this article. Company is well known at Balkans and pioneer in online gambling in that market. There is enough referrals and sources online to support authority of the corporation. Also, I do not agree with S Marshall that page should be moved to list of online casinos, since the Meridian Gaming Ltd is software development company and betting operator at first. —MissKnowItOl
  • Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:GNG. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt. This is a poorly written advert that apparently has a tendency to reappear. Wikipedia is not an advertising blog. Fails WP:GNG. WP:WWIN. SW3 5DL (talk) 18:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and salt I do not see enough secondary sources talking about this company. In addition, the repeated attempts to recreate it show that the aim is to promote the company. In addition, I just had a look at the history of Metioche (disambiguation) (See Special:Contributions/Sadlyraft) and there was a highly disruptive attempt to hijack the disambiguation article. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:58, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looking at the history of that page, I think we've got sufficient evidence for an SPI-case: See Special:Contributions/Alexdjix89 , Special:Contributions/Alexdjix89, Special:Contributions/37.18.184.12. Kleuske (talk) 16:27, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sadlyraft. Kleuske (talk) 17:09, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.