The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:17, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Crispin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear notable per WP:MUSICBIO or WP:BIO. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:48, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject fails WP:BASIC, WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:MUSICBIO. Sources massively fail WP:RS. A Google failed to yield anything that rings the notability bell. Article feels promotional. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No real sources. A small claim of notability that is not sourced. --Rob (talk) 08:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I found nothing online. Willing to change my mind if better sourcing can be shown from deeper in the Internet. Bearian (talk) 20:47, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.