The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 12:41, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mid-Erie Counseling and Treatment Services[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable corporation article written by an SPA. Trivial and few mentions in sources. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 18:35, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This organization is not large or influential enough to meet notability standards, and has no other reasons for notability. --Gccwang (talk) 04:24, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete worthy organisation, but doesn't meet WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 08:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010 • (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No apparent notability. DGG ( talk ) 00:00, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.