The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Earth country rankings[edit]

Miss Earth country rankings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Miss Earth company seems to have an aggressive policy of building many endless pages of intricate detail for their business. This unsourced list page has no encyclopedic value, and is clearly not at all like the Olympic metals. Delete as WP:VANISPAM Legacypac (talk) 13:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 19:32, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong Delete: This material is technically unverifiable because its sourcing is unknown and the sourcing is unretrievable on attempting a reasonable search. Technically, unless an editorially reviewed journalist were to compile this in a proper WP:RS, and none has, only the organization itself could hope to generate or maintain a correct list that corresponds to its organizational rules and procedures, which can change (and actually have) over time. (For example, among many possible questions, if there were an available official tabulation by Miss Earth would dethroned awardees be counted or not?) As such, Wikipedia policy is for deletion here. Parenthetically, from a utilization viewpoint, this table has no encyclopedic merit whatsoever (I will keep this brief but I will expound in detail if asked). The sole purpose of this table is commercial promotion. The organization itself or a fan site could opt to host any definitive official data they wish to maintain for their commercial purposes. FeatherPluma (talk) 18:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It also does not add up - check the rows like USA - the math is wrong or the data is wrong, more likely both. Legacypac (talk) 08:53, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Couldn't really put it any better than Featherpluma has. Mabalu (talk) 16:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete unsourced, WP:OR and plain fancruft. The Banner talk 23:28, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.