The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Hawks (soundtrack). I went with Hawks (soundtrack) because that article mentions Moonlight Madness, whereas Tales from the Brothers Gibb does not. Mz7 (talk) 00:09, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moonlight Madness (Barry Gibb album)[edit]

Moonlight Madness (Barry Gibb album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A legendary unreleased album with no verifiable sources. The article is entirely dependent on a single fan site that only has one brief paragraph on this supposed album in a list of other items; and I also found this :[1] which has a little more info but is also fan-generated. No verifiable information can be found to show that sessions took place, and even if they did, there is no information on the world's reaction to the fact that the album was never released. Largely WP:FANCRUFT that is better left elsewhere. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 21:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 00:18, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - If we're stuck in a no-consensus land here, as the nominator I would support redirecting as the two previous voters suggested. Hawks (soundtrack) seems like the better target but some additional confirmation from knowledgeable fans might help. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.