The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. PhilKnight (talk) 11:08, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Motocross Challenge[edit]

Motocross Challenge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 12:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete A home brew video game is not notable, so unless its proven its special, delete. Boccobrock•T 16:36, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. Someoneanother 01:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Doesn't matter if it's three guys in a basement, doesn't matter if their deal with Nintendo fell through, doesn't matter if they're giving it away gratis. Independent coverage establishes notability, and in this article, reviews are clearly linked. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 13:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep One of the review sites may not be independent since the site is also selling the game. The other review seems OK. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Seems notable enough to me due to independent coverage. Wikipedia:Notability_(toys_and_games) does not inherently discount the article, rather notes that extra caution should be taken. -Rushyo (talk) 18:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep – There's evidence of notability (homebrew games can be notable and hence worthy of an article). Article does need expanding, though. MuZemike (talk) 19:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.