The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was the subject is notable (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 03:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Whipple[edit]

Mr. Whipple (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article can easily be redirected to the product. This is a fictional character and the article has been tagged as needing additional citations since 2009 Lightburst (talk) 01:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 01:57, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. ミラP 04:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ミラP 04:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. GentlemanGhost (séance) 02:53, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• The article can easily be redirected to the product.

  Then do it? Nominators are expected to attempt alternatives to deletion before coming to AfD. (not watching, please ((ping))) czar 07:53, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Mr. Whipple is an advertising character who has appeared in 500 commercials over the span of 20 years. There are sources estabilishing notability from the Reuters news organization [1] to Adweek [2] to even scholarly journal articles, such as this one at JSTOR [3]. --GentlemanGhost (séance) 03:28, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The references above provided by GentlemanGhost, more than suffice. Nfitz (talk) 21:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Famous mascot. WP:BEFORE. Bearian (talk) 16:25, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - work done since article was nominated show they pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:40, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.