The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:16, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MyVaccs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An orphan stub article with a single source, which only mentions the website as a small feature of a larger piece. The article has had a 'notability' tag for 17 months, and doesn't appear to pass the guidelines on WP:NWEB.- Donkey1989 (talk) 01:22, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I did a search and was only able to find one sole news source that actually focused on this product. The other news coverage is the very brief paragraph written in the aforementioned BBC article, meaning that there isn't enough coverage of this product/website to warrant it having a Wikipedia article. Fails WP:NWEB.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:22, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The only sources I have found is the same BBC News article that is currently displayed and I have searched with both Google US and Google UK news. SwisterTwister talk 06:04, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per above, pretty much fails WP:NWEB. -- SUFC Boy 13:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to assert notability Widefox; talk 11:26, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:42, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.