The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:20, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

NYLXS[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources to establish notability since 2009, probably self promotional. GM83 (talk) 03:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Current article is irredeemable WP:PROMOTION. If sources can be found, a neutral article can be written in its place. Pburka (talk) 04:34, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Can't find anything mentioning them except self-published material or notices on event boards. Bordwall(^talk⁄_ctrb) 16:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now - The best my searches (News, Books, highbeam and thefreelibrary) found was this, this and this (all minor). SwisterTwister talk 21:00, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.