The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:50, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

National Atheist Party[edit]

National Atheist Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable as a political party per WP:ORG, especially as they've not even registered as a party yet; zero GNEWS hits, no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Gurt Posh (talk) 11:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 11:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 11:25, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I believe in the lowest of all possible bars at Wikipedia for the inclusion of pages on political parties, their leaders, and their youth sections — regardless of ideology. That said, this unsourced piece about an organization "Founded: March 8, 2011" does not meet the minimum standard of actual, verifiable existence as a political organization. Thirty six state Facebook links don't cut it. This page is, in the final analysis, promotional in intent rather than historical in nature. Carrite (talk) 14:57, 23 August 2011 (UTC) Last edit: Carrite (talk) 14:59, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:ORG and per the article: just-formed group "...currently in the process of registering as an official party." Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I don't care if the party was formed last Tuesday in someone's basement and has no real membership. I don't care if it has been active since 1066 and has 50 million members in 26 countries. If it has significant coverage in independent reliable sources, it is notable. If it doesn't, it's not. This one doesn't. It's not notable. - SummerPhD (talk) 22:41, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Clearly fails WP:ORG. Appears to have no - much less significant - coverage in reliable secondary sources.--JayJasper (talk) 17:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - strike this one down with a bolt of lightening, the organization has no notability yet. Come back when you elect a candidate, or at least get significant news coverage for trying. Bella the Ball (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No evidence that this is an actual political party. Joe Chill (talk) 23:39, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.