The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was del `'mikka 02:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It isn't a district in anything but policial terms, and there's not much hear to say or to salvage, so I would say delete. --It's-is-not-a-genitive 17:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, a police district is still notable. Just to be clear, we're not talking about a random bunch of houses under a police station here, but a section of a district, which is a single unit for tax collection purposes, that is different for law enforcement purposes. Frequently the chief civil servant, the District Magistrate, is considered to be a joint magistrate of both police districts. Whatever, its all very confusing, and left over from 1768 or whenever. Just leave it be, its not a hoax, or non-notable. Hornplease 16:21, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
What is the estimated population of Navgachia ?
Delete. As of now, the article contains only one sentence about Navgachia being a district of Bihar (which is inaccurate). If necessary, a new article about the police district can always be created at Navgachia police district. Since the new article will have to be anyway written from scratch, I don't see why this inaccurate piece of information should be kept. We already have an article on Naugachhia. utcursch | talk 16:44, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The point is, it's not a district and the article has just one sentence that says it's a district. If it's a block, a new article can be created at Navgachia police district/Navgachia block. The page should be deleted because "Navgachia District" is an inaccurate title. There is nothing to move or merge -- we already have an article on Naugachhia. utcursch | talk 09:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not a district as defined for other districts in the state. There is so little information that it is almost close to zero so recreating it under a correct name with better information would make more sense. -- Whpq 17:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.