The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 20:31, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Necessity Village[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The was listed for speedy as a non-notable planned event, but no admin has been willing to speedy delete it for the past 48 hours. I think the community should make the decision. DGG ( talk ) 23:56, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:35, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:35, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. czar · · 01:35, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. News, not encyclopedia-worty.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 10:48, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The fact that there is coverage in the LA Times would be sufficient to negate a speedy deletion. However, the coverage is routine news reporting from the overall Occupy protests, and has made no lasting impact. There is not much coverage at the time of the event, and none subsequently. -- Whpq (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Whpq. Coverage not sufficient to satisy WP:GNG.--JayJasper (talk) 18:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. News, not encyclopedic, routine news reporting. LGA _talk^edits 08:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.