The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:CSD#G5. ✗plicit 11:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Niraj Vikarm[edit]

Niraj Vikarm (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sending to AfD after PROD was objected by creator. Reason is still the same: No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources that would demonstrate meeting WP:GNG or WP:NCREATIVE. – NJD-DE (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. – NJD-DE (talk) 12:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Subject may be notable but that is not enough for an encyclopaedic entry. ⋙–Cometty—► 14:01, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:08, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete My searches in English found no significant coverage in independent reliable sources: fails WP:GNG nor WP:NCREATIVE. BrutBrother (talk) 10:50, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.