The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I have indeed deleted this article as promotional. Recently added content is nothing more than unencyclopedic content because improperly sourced and clearly intended to function as a portfolio/brochure. Drmies (talk) 20:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nucleus Premium Properties Private ltd.[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I reviewed this and added it to my watchlist and after searching for sources (News, Books, browser, highbeam and thefreelibrary), there aren't any other solid third-party sources with the article reading more like a personal page or otherwise company-generated page and the sources are mostly primary and for minor awards. While it seems the author has had a few edits and good intentions, this company's article (Nucleus Premium Properties) was also previously deleted as G11 and A7. It's worth noting the author's other article is being nominated as well at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robin Bladimir (2nd nomination) (recreated after speedied and thus now renominated). SwisterTwister talk 17:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 00:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User:Wikikings Please do not remove the AFD tag from the article, until this discussion is completed. ~~Sulabhvarshney (talk) 10:06, 23 July 2015 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChunnuBhai (talk • contribs) [reply]

Just reverted them again. Primefac (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts blocked for Sockpuppetry. Mike V • Talk 15:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi , May i know on what basis an Afd notice is placed in the article ? I dont find any fault ! Nucleus is a prominent brand in Kerala,India. A famous builder and lot of news articles are available in their name . Few are placed below : http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/kochi/Nucleus-Bags-Lions-Club-Award/2015/06/18/article2871910.ece http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/kochi/Award-Given-Away/2014/09/29/article2454094.ece http://www.newindianexpress.com/cities/kochi/Luxury-Villa-Project-at-Devalokam/2014/10/17/article2481344.ece http://news24hours.in/brand-icons-2014-driven-by-excellence/ http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/Realty-offers-Buyers-have-a-ball/articleshow/46161376.cms http://newsgulf.blogspot.in/2014/10/nucleus-premium-properties-pvt-ltd-is.html https://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/kochi-dream-bythe-sea/1/344764.html http://www.firstpost.com/business/desperate-builders-resort-to-more-freebies-to-sell-houses-but-buyers-are-just-not-biting-2100823.html http://m.newindianexpress.com/kochi/432426 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnabraham1 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 23 July 2015‎ (UTC)[reply] Johnabraham1, the reason for the deletion nomination is right up at the top of this page. I think SwisterTwister has done a fairly succinct job of explaining it. Additionally, please make sure you sign your comments with ~~~~ so that we know who commented. Primefac (talk) 14:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply] SwisterTwister please respond to this , What is the problem with the wiki page , u can search in google or other search engines for Nucleus Premium properties , lot and lot of links with pop up , there are lot of news about the particular company . And they have been awarded Most Trusted Builder award by Times of India, hand over by Finance Minister of Kerala , They have got Lions club award , awarded by Chief minister of Kerala etc.. and you are telling that awards are minor awards ??? I can't understand that ! Johnabraham1 (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply] Remove tag, Tag can be romoved once page is edited adding relevant news links Lionmaniac (talk) 09:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply] Keep, This article can be alive in wiki once relevant links are attached to the project section. Wikipediarajav (talk) 08:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)— Wikipediarajav (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Accounts blocked for Sockpuppetry. Mike V • Talk 15:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , May i know on what basis an Afd notice is placed in the article ? I dont find any fault ! Nucleus is a prominent brand in Kerala,India. A famous builder and lot of news articles are available in their name . Few are placed below :

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnabraham1 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 23 July 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Johnabraham1, the reason for the deletion nomination is right up at the top of this page. I think SwisterTwister has done a fairly succinct job of explaining it. Additionally, please make sure you sign your comments with ~~~~ so that we know who commented. Primefac (talk) 14:29, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SwisterTwister please respond to this , What is the problem with the wiki page , u can search in google or other search engines for Nucleus Premium properties , lot and lot of links with pop up , there are lot of news about the particular company . And they have been awarded Most Trusted Builder award by Times of India, hand over by Finance Minister of Kerala , They have got Lions club award , awarded by Chief minister of Kerala etc.. and you are telling that awards are minor awards ??? I can't understand that !

Johnabraham1 (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Remove tag, Tag can be romoved once page is edited adding relevant news links Lionmaniac (talk) 09:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, This article can be alive in wiki once relevant links are attached to the project section. Wikipediarajav (talk) 08:07, 26 July 2015 (UTC)— Wikipediarajav (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete, doesn't meet our notability criteria. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unremarkable builder lacking non-trivial support. Support consists of blogs, company website, and a few minor articles. Awards are local in nature. reddogsix (talk) 14:04, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Times of India is a leading Newspaper giant in India , The builder was awarded Most Trustable builder by Times of India and I found links about the buider in the article from Indian express , firstpost , India Today , economic times , news24hours , newskarnataka etc.. which are leading dailies in India. the article can be live. Mr.Wikiworld (talk) 11:14, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
keeP important links about the builder found . page can be alive Ashwinpkrishna (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There's not significant and better coverage from those sources though and most of it is primary and such. SwisterTwister talk 19:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Supporting the page to be live. Nucleus has every right to have a wiki page , if Skyline Builders has right to have page in wiki or Confidence Group or The Leela Palaces, Hotels and Resorts has right to have wiki page. Nucleus has every right to be in wiki with the current no: of links tht is seen in the page created. Mblazewiki (talk) 21:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but where's the better coverage that is needed? @DGG: I'd appreciate some sensible users commenting. SwisterTwister talk 21:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

5+ articles about the builder in the leading daily in India . This is what i found when i searched Nucleus Properties in New Indian Express .

I found all these links relevant and in support to keep the page live.

Mblazewiki (talk) 22:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CommentI reviewed using the first comment in this discussion and found souces in news and highbeam etc

Highbeam : http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-34789204.html, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-3266019401.html, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-34789204.html

Google search : Keyword : "Nucleus Premium Properties" Mblazewiki (talk) 22:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Deletion templates on article and this discussion deleted by author. Gives one little confidence that she/he is here for the benefit of Wikipedia Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:49, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Regardless of notability, the articles is a promotional listing of properties and nothing more, (e.g. "Nucleus Raymount is the latest lifestyle edition from Nucleus" ) and should probably have been deleted as G11. As for notability, the awards and the consequent articles are unsubstantial and basically PR. DGG ( talk ) 04:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~Struck double vote. Changes made ; lets do a constructive discuss as of on what all grounds the article can be live ? Mblazewiki (talk) 19:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.