The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 18:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Old Oscott F.C.[edit]

Old Oscott F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable amateur football team. It does not pass WP:GNG as it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. Neither does it pass WP:FOOTYN guideline for the notability of football teams as the team has not played at level 10 in England or entered the FA Cup or FA Vase. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 23:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:01, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 00:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - does not pass WP:GNG and has not played at a sufficient sporting level. GiantSnowman 11:41, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:GNG... JMHamo (talk) 11:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Fails WP:FOOTYN as has not played in a national competition. no indication of GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:12, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per everyone above, team plays way below the notability cut-off -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:38, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:ORG. The Whispering Wind (talk) 00:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.