The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Nutcracker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game. One review is cited on what appears to be a non-reliable source, and a Google search does not deliver any reliable hits that add notability. Games are not my strong point; feel free to prove me wrong by pointing to reliable sources. Drmies (talk) 02:54, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The game is better known as The Nutcracker, although the title screen says Operation Nutcracker. Paul 1953 (talk) 09:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - The PocketNow review is not well written, but the site seems to have a strong editorial team [1], so I'm not sure about it's use. I could not find any other reviews, although there is a poor signal-to-noise ratio with all the download/directory sites. Marasmusine (talk) 10:35, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:24, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.