- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 15:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Operation Tunisia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only three sources in this article mention "Operation Tunisia," 1. a possible unreliable website named My Consumer Electronics, 2. a blog, and 3. a video on youtube that is not confirmed to be from Anonymous. If not deleted, the article should be renamed. Not notable. PerpetuityGrat (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tunisia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:47, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep seems to be the focus of in-depth coverage e.g. this 2015 book chapter. A JSTOR search pulls up mention in several other academic books as well. That first one is the only open access one sadly, but I'm happy to send along copies to anyone interested (maybe included in the WP Library access?). Seems like this has attracted sufficient enduring coverage to meet WP:GNG. Ajpolino (talk) 04:30, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I agree with Ajpolino that the scholarly sources contribute to notability, and there are several reliable sources already in the article that clearly are discussing this incident in depth, even if they don't use the term "Operation Tunisia". If renaming is necessary (and I'm skeptical), that can be dealt with through WP:RM, but deletion is unnecessary. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:20, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.