The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was userfy to User:Theturquoisesummer/Oramics (band). King of ♠ 20:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oramics (band)[edit]

Oramics (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I declined a CSD A7, as the comments on the talk page did suggest there would be some coverage in sources, given the band has one member of a notable band, in as much as Allmusic documents him here. However, that page doesn't mention Oramics and a search for sources came up with nothing. I would have expected at least some local news coverage, but there doesn't appear to be even that. So currently, it is too soon for an article. Maybe next year. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:40, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:41, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ritchie Ritchie333

Can we please hold. There is going to be a ton of press at the end of the month when a music label publishes some songs they have made. Please hold on deletion. Thank you! Feel free to ask me any further questions.

theturquoisesummer

I'm happy to move this to Articles for Creation, where it can be parked pending sources. However, even with lots of press, it might take six months for it to be suitable for an article. Wikipedia tends to be behind the times. In the meantime, I'll see if there are any further comments. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:57, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.