The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a copyright violation. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series)[edit]

P.O.V. (Batman: The Animated Series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This is a paragraph of trivial production details of a television episode. They also come from a forum post (though attributed to a magazine), so they may just be original research. TTN (talk) 18:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The author is copying and pasting from tv.com again. The same article was G12 speedied last week. • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:25, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete (G12) and salt — blatant copyright infringement again. Also recommend creation protection for the article. Also, it seems that the same user created the article both times; editor shall be warned as such one more time of not posting copyrighted material onto the mainspace. MuZemike (talk) 19:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as copyvio, but do not salt - this episode was discussed by the creators in reliable, third-party sources. A decent article could be written. *** Crotalus *** 20:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Notability not established Dreamspy (talk) 20:50, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete (db-repost). -- Magioladitis (talk) 01:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• delete but don't salt. Quite likely a notable topic, but this one is apparently a copyright violation. Hobit (talk) 04:20, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.