The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:21, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PakTribune[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this is not a newspaper. though several books cited news articles published by this news portal website [1] however the newswebsite itself has not been subject of coverage in RS. nor this news portal is among the highest traffic news sites in Pakistan.. ranking 21,700 in Pakistan therefore i consider it failing to meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). a similar example is The News Tribe which ranks 2,600 in Pakistan and despite being in the G'books it was deleted as well. Saqib (talk) 09:01, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:10, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as no coverage in WP:RS. Greenbörg (talk) 10:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jdcomix (talk) 01:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I've added a friendly search suggestions on the talk page. Coverage should surface.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 01:34, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to give reason why the page should be kept and provide RS. --Saqib (talk) 05:41, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:41, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:09, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete fails WP:RS and doesn't have enough traffic or notability to have their own article. Excelse (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.